
Access request and records search support
When a customer, patient or former employee asks for all the personal information you hold about them, the legal clock starts immediately. The hard part is finding everything across mailboxes, Teams, SharePoint, Google Drive and business systems. We run those searches defensibly and prepare the results for review.
Reviewed by the ITRS security team · Last updated
This page is general information, not legal advice. For advice on your obligations, speak with your lawyer.
Access rights in Canada
Every Canadian privacy regime gives individuals a right to see the personal information an organization holds about them. Under PIPEDA's individual access principle, a person can ask whether you hold personal information about them, how it has been used and to whom it has been disclosed, and get access to it, subject to limited exceptions. BC and Alberta's private-sector laws and Quebec's private-sector law give similar rights, and Ontario's PHIPA gives patients a right of access to their health records.
Requests often arrive in the middle of a dispute: an employee who has just been terminated, a customer with a complaint, a patient considering a claim. That makes them sensitive. The response has to be complete and on time, and must not disclose other people's information or privileged material.
Timelines and extensions
If you miss the deadline under PIPEDA without a valid extension, the request can be deemed refused, which opens the door to a complaint. Plan the search in the first few days, not the last.
| Law | Basic response time | Extensions |
|---|---|---|
PIPEDA | 30 days after receiving the request | Up to a further 30 days in specified circumstances (such as unreasonable interference with operations, or consultations needed), or longer to convert to an alternative format; notice of extension required within the first 30 days |
BC PIPA | 30 days | Up to an additional 30 days in specified circumstances, or longer with the commissioner's permission |
Quebec private-sector Act | Promptly and no later than 30 days | Reply must be in writing from the person in charge of the protection of personal information |
Finding the information: Microsoft 365 and Google searches
A person's information rarely sits in one place. It is in email threads, Teams chats, shared files, CRM notes, HR and payroll systems, ticketing tools and backups. We search each source using defensible methods so you can show the search was reasonable:
Scope
Confirm the requester's identity, names, email addresses, phone numbers, employee or account IDs, and the date range.
Microsoft 365
Use Microsoft Purview eDiscovery searches across Exchange mailboxes, OneDrive, SharePoint and Teams, with holds where needed so content isn't deleted mid-request.
Google Workspace
Use Google Vault searches and exports across Gmail, Drive and Chat where Vault is licensed.
Business systems
Run reports or exports from CRM, HR, payroll, practice management and ticketing systems, working with the system owners.
De-duplicate and organize
Remove duplicates, thread conversations and organize results for review.
Log everything
Record sources searched, terms used, dates and result counts.
Third-party information and redaction
Most records about one person also contain information about others: colleagues in an email chain, other customers in a spreadsheet, a manager's notes. Privacy laws generally require you to protect third-party personal information when responding, and there may be other grounds to withhold material, such as solicitor-client privilege or information generated in a formal dispute resolution process. Those are legal decisions.
Our role is to make that review efficient. We prepare the collection in a review platform or structured export, flag documents likely to contain third-party information or privileged communications (for example, messages to or from your lawyers), and apply redactions as directed by your privacy officer or counsel. The final decision on what is released stays with you.
Documenting the response
If the requester complains to a privacy commissioner, you will need to show what you did. We deliver a search memo that records the scope, sources, methods, dates, search terms and result counts, plus a record of what was withheld or redacted and on whose instruction. Keep it with the request file. It is also useful if the same person later brings a legal claim and the same information has to be preserved or produced.
Making the next one easier
- A simple intake form and request log, with deadline tracking.
- A standard list of systems to search, maintained in your data inventory.
- Retention policies applied so you are not searching through data you should have deleted years ago.
- Pre-configured eDiscovery or Vault roles, so the right people can search without broad admin rights.
- Template letters for acknowledgement, extension and response.
Frequently asked questions
It depends on the law that applies and how practical it is. Many organizations search live systems and document why backups were not searched, but that is a decision to make with counsel, not by default. Good retention settings reduce how often the question arises.
The access right still applies, but counsel will want to coordinate the response with the dispute, and litigation holds may already be in place. We keep the access-request collection consistent with any legal hold so the two processes don't contradict each other.
Often, yes, for straightforward requests. We are most useful when the request is large, contentious or time-pressured, when several systems are involved, or when you need an independent, documented search.
Related work.
- Case studyRecovering a Total ERP Database Outage in a Single MorningHow IT Rapid Support traced a total Spire database outage to a changed server network profile and had every affected workstation back the same morning.
- Case studyFrom Breach Forensics to a Company-Wide Identity PlanFrom reconstructing a 2018 mailbox compromise minute by minute to scoping centralized Entra ID and Intune management for a 40 to 50 person pharma firm.
Related.
- PracticePrivacy, Data Governance & AIPIPEDA and Quebec Law 25 readiness, data mapping, breach notification and AI governance.
- GuideMicrosoft 365 litigation hold and content search for law firms and legal teamsHow Microsoft 365 preserves and finds content for legal matters in the current Microsoft Purview eDiscovery experience: holds versus retention, creating a case and hold…
- GuideGoogle Vault retention rules and holdsGoogle Vault is Workspace's built-in tool for keeping, preserving and exporting data.
Not sure what your obligations require of your systems?
Speak with our privacy practice. We are staffed 24/7. Active incident? Call (289) 582-9930, 24/7.
